RSS
Showing posts with label Study to show thyself approved. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Study to show thyself approved. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Interesting

Last week when I was studying the life of Yahshua, I thought about these things...

The good news (gospel) of the kingdom cannot solely be about Yahshua's death and resurrection, as is often taught today, because he was preaching it, as were John the Baptist and the disciples, before his death. So what is the good news?

Likewise, we find forgiveness of sins before his death, even through the old testament.

Monday, May 10, 2010

A Bit Worth Reading

Someday I would love to really write about the things I believe and the things I'm studying... but so many have written these things out and I'm not into that re-inventing the wheel thing.  I've wanted to share for years the truth about heaven and hell and the coming kingdom, I want to share what we're learning about who Yahshua really was and what his life and death means to us today...   Bobby shared the following article with me the other night and I'd love for you to consider it.  Except for a few minor details, we agree with it.  I don't know the author and therefore can't neccesairly recommend anything else he may have written.  (Sorry about the formatting... for some reason things never copy over the way they should.  The author's emphasis in bold and italics didn't copy.  The original can be read here.)



HAVE YOU HEARD?



By Juan Baixeras


Most Christians are under the impression that what they have come to believe and accept as Christianity, is the same as what Jesus and the Apostles taught. This unfortunately is not the case. Greek philosophy, disastrously crept into the early church and changed some of the most fundamental and important concepts of the faith. What happened in a nutshell is the following: in the time of Jesus and the Apostles, Greek thought was considered to be the most enlightening way of thinking. All the educated people in those days had been educated in Greek philosophy. Greek was considered to be the international language of the civilized world, much as English is today. This is why the New Testament was written in Greek. Platonism was very widespread and very influential in those days. All of a sudden, here comes this man called Paul preaching the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, and doing incredible miracles in Jesus’ name. In his visits he converts many Greeks and people who have been taught the ways of Greek philosophy their whole lives. These were people who had been pagans for their entire lives up to this point, and now suddenly, they hear Paul’s message of the kingdom and believe the truth. They truly accept the kingdom of God message and Jesus Christ as the Messiah. But when time passes and the Apostles are no longer around, they start reading the Hebrew Scriptures with a Greek mind, that is, a thought process that is influenced by Greek philosophy. Attempting to read Hebrew Scriptures in this way will inevitably lead to the misinterpretation of some of the writings, which is exactly what happened in some key areas. A friend of mine has a great example of what I am speaking about. He says that if an Englishman says "I am mad about my flat." He is actually saying that he is excited about his apartment, but to an American it means that "he is angry about his flat tire." In this case they are both speaking English in the same century, now imagine what can happen when you try to interpret Hebrew writings using Greek philosophy a few centuries later. We must discard the Greek philosophical interpretations and return to what the words originally meant in Hebrew and Greek. Make no mistake, Greek philosophy has different definitions for words than does the Greek language.



By using Greek philosophical definitions the most important message of the Bible has been changed into something that has very few if anything in common with the original message. This is why it is so important for each of us to know God’s word, so that we can avoid being deceived.



"Many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1 Jn 4:1).



"False messiahs and false prophets will arise, and they will perform signs and wonders so great as to deceive, if that were possible, even the elect" (Mt 24:24).




By answering a few of the following questions, you will be able to tell if you have been led astray by false teachings. Believe me, Satan does not want you to hear this message. If you do not find one of the verses which I quote from the Old Testament, please look one verse above or below, some Bibles have a slight difference in numeration in the Old Testament.



What does the Bible say that it takes to have eternal life? 99.999% of people I ask this question to will answer by quoting one of the Scriptures in which Jesus says that whoever believes in him has eternal life, such as Jn 3:16. My next question to them is, believes in him what? The reply is always, that Jesus died for your sins. This answer is only half-correct, but they are missing a very important half. Right now you are probably saying to yourself "what can the other half possibly be?" Let me answer that question with another question.



Why did Jesus come into this world? Again, the reply is; that Jesus came to die on the cross and pay for our sins. Let us take a look at the reason Jesus gives us as to why he came.



Luke 4:43



"To the other towns I must proclaim the good news of the kingdom of God, because for this purpose I have been sent."



Luke 8:1



"Afterward he journeyed from one town and village to another, preaching and proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God."



Mark 1: 14-15



"After John had been arrested, Jesus came to Galilee proclaiming the gospel of God. This is the time of fulfillment. The kingdom of God is at hand."



The kingdom of God is also referred to as the kingdom of heaven, the gospel of the kingdom, the word of God, the gospel, word of the Lord, the mystery of the gospel, the gospel of Christ, the truth, and the word. These are the main titles that are used to refer to the kingdom of God, there are several more which are used less frequently, But these will suffice for this paper.



The reason Jesus came was to proclaim the kingdom of God message. The reason that he died on the cross was so that we could enter into the kingdom of God. When Jesus says that he who believes in him has eternal life, he is not talking about believing that he died for your sins, he is still alive at this time. Even his Apostles did not understand about the resurrection until the very end.



As Jesus and the Apostles are approaching Jerusalem, Jesus for the third time tries to explain to them why he has to die, and they still do not understand.



"But they understood nothing of this; the word remained hidden from them and they failed to comprehend what he said" (Luke 18:34).



But way before this episode, Luke talks about Jesus sending the 12 Apostles out to preach the kingdom of God:



"And he sent them to proclaim the kingdom of God and to heal the sick"



(Luke 9:2).



Then he sent out the seventy-two to proclaim the kingdom of God:



"cure the sick in it and say to them, "The kingdom of God is at hand for you"



(Luke 10:9).





Obviously the resurrection of Jesus is not a part of the kingdom of God message which Jesus and the Apostles are proclaiming at that time.



The kingdom of God message is the central theme of the Old and New Testament. When Jesus, after the resurrection appears to them for forty days, his main instruction is still on the kingdom of God.



"He presented himself alive to them by many proofs after he had suffered, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God" (Acts 1:3).



This was the main mission of Jesus and the Apostles, to proclaim the kingdom of God. Here are some more examples:



Matthew 24:14 (Jesus speaking)



"And the gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come."



Acts 8:12



"But once they began to believe Philip as he preached the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ."



Acts 19:8 (Paul)



"He entered the synagogue, and for three months debated boldly with persuasive arguments about the kingdom of God."



Acts 20:25 ( Paul )



"But now I know that none of you to whom I preached the kingdom during my travels will ever see my face again."



Acts 28:23 ( Paul )



"Bearing witness to the kingdom of God and trying to convince them about Jesus from the law of Moses and the prophets."



Acts 28:31 ( Paul )



"And without hindrance he proclaimed the kingdom of God and taught about the Lord Jesus Christ."



Your next question should be; what is the kingdom of God message, and why have I not heard almost anything on it before? The reason you have not heard much about the kingdom of God message is because this is the message that Satan hates the most, because this is the message that saves you. The kingdom of God message that is prophesied by the Hebrew prophets is summarized as:



"The kingdom of God will be established throughout the world with a rehabilitated Jerusalem as its capital and the Messiah (Jesus, whom God resurrected) as God’s ideal king of Israel (Isarel=Christians) administering an ideal government. It will be a government of peace and justice, and we, the resurrected saints, will help Jesus in its administration."



This is the message that we must believe in. This is the theme of the entire Bible. The reason of the resurrection was not only to atone for our sins, but it was also the proof that Jesus was who he said he was, the Messiah. When Jesus said that whoever believes in him will have eternal life, he was saying that whoever believes that he is the Messiah will have eternal life, not that whoever believes that he died for your sins will have eternal life. The Messiah is supposed to die for our sins, but that is only a part of the kingdom of God message, it is not the whole message. This is how Satan has tried to distort matters, and by looking at the current situation, he has done a pretty good job of it.



If you would like to see the seriousness of the message and how Satan tries to keep you from it, just read the Parable of the Sower :



Luke 8:11-12



"The seed is the word of God (means"word of the kingdom," compare it to Matthew 13:19). Those on the path are the ones who have heard, but the devil comes and takes the word from their hearts that they may not believe and be saved."



Satan will do whatever he can to keep you from this message, this is why most of us are so unfamiliar with it. Don’t you think that since this was the central theme of Jesus and the Apostle’s teachings, that we should be a little more familiar with it. But most of us are not. When you do hear something on it, it is usually distorted and a completely different message from what the prophets talked about. People will say that the kingdom of God is really in your heart, or that it is the church. In order to clear up any misunderstandings, let us take a look at all the prophesies of the Messiah and the kingdom of God from Abraham all the way through the New Testament and let you judge for yourself.











THE OLD TESTAMENT











In these verses you will see what God has promised Abraham and his descendants, the land, the earth, the nations as our inheritance, not heaven. It started with the promises that God made to Abraham that he and his descendants would inherit the Promised Land forever. This of course has not happened. Abraham never inherited the land, and his descendants who reached Israel did not keep it forever. They lost their land and recovered it again in 1948. Obviously God’s promises to Abraham have not been fulfilled yet, and since God does not lie, it will happen.



Psalms 115:16



"The highest heavens belong to the LORD, but the earth he has given to man."



Genesis 13:15



"All the land that you see I will give to you (Abraham) and your seed forever."



Psalm 37:9,11,22,29,34



"But those who wait for the LORD shall posses the land."



"But the meek shall posses the land."



"But those whom He blesses shall posses the land."



"The just shall posses the land and dwell in it forever."



"He will promote you to ownership of the land."



Psalm 2:7-9



"The LORD said to me, "You are my son; this day I have begotten you. Ask of me and I will give you the nations for an inheritance and the ends of the earth for your possession. You shall rule them with an iron rod."



Zechariah 9:10



"The warriors bow shall be banished, and he shall proclaim peace to the nations. His dominion shall be from sea to sea, and from the River to the ends of the earth."



Isaiah 65:9,17



"My chosen ones shall inherit the land.



Lo, I am about to create new heavens and a new earth; the things of the past shall not be remembered or come to mind."





In these verses you will see that the Messiah is supposed to be a king whose domain is the entire earth and all the nations and its peoples. His kingdom is forever and all shall serve him.



Daniel 7:13-14



"One like a son of man coming, on the clouds of heaven; When he reached the Ancient One and was presented before Him, he received dominion, glory, and kingship; nations and peoples of every language serve him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that shall not be taken away, his kingship shall not be destroyed."



2 Samuel 7:12-14,16



"And when your time comes and you rest with your ancestors, I will raise up your heir after you, sprung from your loins, and I will make his kingdom firm. It is he who shall build a house for my name. And I will make his royal throne firm forever. I will be a father to him, and he shall be a son to me. Your house and your kingdom shall endure forever before me; your throne shall stand firm forever."



Jeremiah 23:5



"Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will raise up a righteous shoot of David; As king he shall reign and govern wisely, he shall do what is just and right in the land."



Daniel 7:27



"Then the kingship and dominion and majesty of all the kingdoms under the heavens shall be given to the holy people of the Most High. Whose kingdom shall be everlasting: all dominions shall serve and obey him."



Isaiah 49:6-7



"I will make you a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth. When kings see you, they shall stand up, and princes shall prostrate themselves."



Psalm 72:11,17



"All kings shall pay him homage, all nations shall serve him.



May his name be blessed forever; as long as the sun his name shall remain. In him all the tribes of the earth be blessed."



Psalm 111:6



"He has made known to His people the power of His works, giving them the lands of the nations."







In the Messianic kingdom there will have to be a centralized seat of power from where the Messiah (king) will reign. These verses will show you that the capital of the Messianic kingdom will be a rehabilitated Jerusalem. Israel = Zion.



Isaiah 24:23: "For the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem."



Psalm 135:21: "Blessed from Zion be the LORD, who dwells in Jerusalem."



Micah 5:2,3-4



"From you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel.



He shall stand firm and shepherd his flock by the strength of the LORD, in the majestic name of the LORD, his God; And they shall remain, for now his greatness shall reach to the ends of the earth; he shall be peace."



Psalm 89:4,27-30,37



"Forever will I confirm your posterity and establish your throne for all generations.



He shall say of me "You are my father, my God, the rock, my savior." And I will make him the first-born, highest of the kings of the earth. Forever I will maintain my kindness toward him, and my covenant with him stands firm. I will make his posterity endure forever."



Psalm 110:1-2



"The LORD said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand till I make your enemies your footstool." The scepter of your power the LORD will stretch forth from Zion."



Psalm 132:11,14,17-18



"Your own offspring I will set upon your throne.



Zion is my resting place forever; in her I will dwell, for I prefer her.



In her I will make a horn sprout forth for David; I will place a lamp for my anointed. His enemies I will clothe with shame, But upon him my crown shall shine."



Isaiah 2:3-4



"For from Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, and impose terms on many peoples.



One nation shall not raise the sword against another."





These verses show that the Messiah will suffer and pay for the world’s sins.



Genesis 12:3



"All the communities of the earth shall find blessing in you."



Isaiah 53:5-6,11-12



"But he was pierced for our offenses, crushed for our sins.



But the LORD laid upon him the guilt of us all.



Through his suffering, my servant shall justify many, and their guilt he shall bear. Therefore I will give him his portion among the great.



And he shall take away the sins of many, and win pardon for their offenses."







NEW TESTAMENT





Now we will compare to see if the New Testament is in agreement with the Old Testament. These verses will show you that the promises made to Abraham in the Old Testament are still the central focus of Christianity. Jesus Christ came to proclaim and confirm the promises made to Abraham.



Galatians 3:29



"If you belong to Christ, then you are reckoned as Abraham’s descendants, heirs according to the promise."



Romans 4:13



"The promise was made to Abraham and his descendants that he would inherit the world."



Romans 15:8



"Christ became a minister of the circumcised to show God’s truthfulness, to confirm the promises made to the patriarchs" (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob)



Ephesians 3:6



"The Gentiles are coheirs, members of the same body, and copartners in the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel."



Acts 26:6-7



"I am standing trial because of my hope in the promise made by God to our ancestors. Our twelve tribes hope to attain to that promise as they fervently worship God day and night; and on account of this hope I am accused by Jews."







These first verses will show that the kingdom of God is still as the Old Testament states, on the earth.



Revelation 5:10



"You made them a kingdom and priests for our God, and they will reign on earth."



Matthew 5:5



"Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the land."



Matthew 25:31-32



"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit upon his glorious throne, and all the nations will be assembled before him. And he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats."



Revelation 2:26



"To the victor, who keeps to my ways until the end, I will give authority over the nations."





These verses will show us that it is an actual kingdom. We are even instructed by Jesus to pray for the coming of this kingdom.



Luke 1:32-33



"He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father, and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end."



Revelation 3:21



"I will give the victor the right to sit with me on my throne, as I myself first won the victory to sit with my Father on his throne."



1 Corinthians 6:2



"Do you not know that the holy one will judge the world."



Luke 12:32



"For your Father is pleased to give you the kingdom."



Matthew 6:10



"Your kingdom come."







These verses show that we the saints (Christians) will reign with Christ in his kingdom. The word that is used for reign in these verses is better understood as administer. So we will help Jesus the Messiah administer the kingdom of God.



Luke 22:29-30



"And I confer a kingdom on you, just as my Father has conferred one on me, that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom; and you will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel."



Revelation 20:4-5



"They came to life and they reigned with Christ for a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were over."



Revelation 20:6



"They will be priests of God and reign with him for the thousand years."



2 Timothy 2:12



"If we persevere we shall also reign with him."



The New Testament agrees completely with what the prophets told us in the Old Testament. The angel Gabriel tells Mary exactly why Jesus has come in Lk 1:32. The kingdom is here on earth, with Jesus the Messiah as our king.



The last piece of this puzzle is; if the kingdom of God is here on earth, how does going to heaven fit in? The answer is, it doesn’t! We are not supposed to go to heaven. Heaven is where God, Jesus, (until his Second Coming) and the angels dwell. God made the earth for us. The paradise where Adam and Eve lived was here on earth, it was not in heaven.



The concept of going to heaven is another one of those Greek concepts that filtered into early Christianity. The Greek philosophers (Pythagoreans) are the ones who believe that the soul separates from the body after death. This is not what the Bible teaches. We are supposed to resurrect like Jesus. Webster’s Dictionary states:



Resurrect - rising from the dead.



If your soul is alive in heaven, then you are by no means dead. Another problem with the concept of your soul going to heaven or hell when you die is, that judgment happens only after Jesus returns. How then, can a soul go to heaven or hell if it hasn’t been judged yet?



Justin Martyr, one of the early Christian theologians wrote in 150 AD:



"If you meet some who say that their souls go to heaven when they die, do not believe that they are Christians!"



He wrote this in order to warn his fellow Christians about a strange new idea that was beginning to creep into Christianity. Well, it is time for you to be the judge again. Here are some examples:



When the Bible talks about being asleep, it means being dead. Read John 11:11-14 if you have any doubts. You will notice that Jesus says that no one has been to heaven. King David who was one of God’s favorites is not in heaven. You will see that there is no knowledge of God when you are dead. If we were to go to heaven I would suppose that you would be well aware of God. The Bible says that man and animals go to the same place when we die, that there is no difference, except that man will one day resurrect. You will notice that all will come to life only at Jesus’ return, and not before. Remember we do not have immortal souls, that is a Greek philosophical idea. Only God is immortal. The Jewish and Christian concept of death is that the whole person dies.



Who is in heaven besides God, Jesus, and the angels? No one.



John 3:13



"No one has gone up to heaven."



Acts 2:29



"My brothers, one can confidently say about the patriarch David that he died and was buried, and his tomb is in our midst to this day."



Acts 2:34



"For David did not go up into heaven."



Hebrews 11:13



"All these died in faith" (Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah).







Where are the dead? In their tombs in the earth. When you are dead there is no knowledge of anything, not even of God.



2 Peter 3:4



"From the time when our ancestors fell asleep, everything has remained as it was from the beginning of creation."



John 5:28-29



"Do not be amazed at this, because the hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good deeds to the resurrection of life, but those who have done wicked deeds to the resurrection of condemnation."



Daniel 12:2



"Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake; some shall live forever, others shall be an everlasting horror and disgrace."



Genesis 3:19



"Until you return to the ground, from which you were taken; for you are dirt, and to dirt you shall return."



Psalms 6:5-6



"Return, O LORD, save my life; rescue me because of your kindness, for among the dead no one remembers you;"



Ezekiel 18:4



"The soul that sins, it shall die."



Ecclesiastes 9:10



"For there will be no work, nor reason, nor knowledge, nor wisdom in the nether world where you are going."



Psalm 115:17



"It is not the dead who praise the LORD."



Ecclesiastes 3:19-20



"For the lot of man and of beast is one lot; the one dies as well as the other. Both have the same life-breath, and man has no advantage over the beast; but all is vanity. Both go to the same place; both were made from the dust, and to the dust they both return."



Psalms 146:4



"When his spirit departs he returns to his earth; on that day his plans perish."





When will the dead rise? At Jesus’ Second Coming, on the last day.



1 Thessalonians 4: 16-17



"For the Lord himself , with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air."



Revelation 20:4-5



"They came to life and they reigned with Christ for a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were over."



1 Corinthians 15:22-23



"For just as in Adam all die, so to in Christ shall all be brought to life, but each one in proper order: Christ the firstfruits; then, at his coming, those who belong to Christ."



John 11:24



"Martha said to him, " I know he will rise, in the resurrection on the last day."



Job 14:12



"So men lie down and rise not again. Till the heavens are no more, they shall not awake, nor be roused out of their sleep."



Mark 12:23



"At the resurrection when they arise, whose wife will she be."













BUT WHAT ABOUT THESE VERSES?











Q. Didn’t Jesus’ Spirit go to be with God when he died?



This question comes from an incorrect Hellenistic (Greek philosophy) interpretation of Luke 23:46:



"Father, into your hands I commend my spirit, and when he had said this he breathed his last."



There are two ways to interpret this verse. The first is the way that most of us have been taught, which is the Hellenistic interpretation. The second is if we use the Jewish meaning of the word "spirit," this is the meaning that was intended by its Jewish author. Lets review what the word "spirit" means to both a Greek philosopher and to a Jew. First, the Greek philosophical definition. To a Greek philosopher, spirit and soul are interchangeable.



Platonism – Believed that we must be capable of existing apart from our bodies. The flesh is evil. The body is a prison. It is bad for the soul (i.e. spirit) to be in the body. Platonism suggests the immortality of the soul, and the soul then becoming incarnate.



This idea of souls separating from our bodies was unknown to the Hebrews. The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible states:



"The ancient Hebrews knew nothing of the Greek concept of salvation by flight from the body and the world of which man is a part of."



This understanding of "spirit" will lead us to many false conclusions. It has problems right away with other passages in the Bible. First, only God is immortal



(1 Timothy 6:15-16). Second, I do not know of anyone that would dispute that judgement happens at the return of Christ. So how can your spirit or soul go to heaven or hell if it has not been judged? This should be a clue that something is wrong with this definition of "spirit."



Using this definition of "spirit" we arrive at the conclusion that when Jesus died, his spirit went to heaven to be with God. This has a few major problems. First, if Jesus went to be with the Father and then came back to appear before the Apostles, and then plans to return again on the day of judgement, then his return will be the third coming of Christ instead of the second. 1+1+1=3. But the biggest problem with this interpretation is that it forms a huge contradiction with John 20:27:



"Stop holding on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father."



Jesus says this to Mary of Magdala after he has resurrected, three days after he commended his spirit to God. He is clearly stating that he has not been to the Father.



If he is has not been with the Father, where has he been? John 12:32 and Matthew 12:40 provide us with the answer:



"And when I am lifted up from the earth, I will draw everyone to myself."





"so will the Son of Man be in the heart of the earth three days and three nights."



Jesus has been in Sheol, a.k.a. the pit, the grave, the earth, for the last three days. Jesus himself tells us he has not been to heaven.



These are the sort of problems that arise when you use definitions that are different from the ones that the writers used. Now lets see what "spirit" means to a Jew:





Spirit (ruah & pneuma) – Breath of life. The vital principle by which the body is animated.



In other words, it is the life force that God gives to people and animals, which animates their bodies, which gives them life. When He takes it away, they die.



"When you take away their breath (ruah), they perish and return to the dust from which they came. When you send forth your breath (ruah), they are created" (Psalm 104:29:30).



"When his spirit (ruah) departs he returns to his earth; on that day his plans perish" (Psalm 146:4).



"And when the dust returns to the earth as it once was, and the life breath (ruah) returns to God who gave it" (Ecclesiastes 12:7).



With the proper definition of "spirit" we can now interpret this verse correctly:



Jesus commends his spirit (breath of life) to God. God takes his breath of life and Jesus breathes his last (he died).



This is the intended Jewish meaning of this verse. This interpretation is in agreement with the Jewish definition of "spirit" and with the psalms that are quoted above. It also does not contradict John 20:17.











Q. What about the thief on the cross, wasn’t he with Jesus in paradise that same day?



This question arises from the verse in Luke 23:43: It states:



"Then he said, ‘Jesus, remember me in your kingdom.’ He replied to him, ‘Amen, I say to you today you will be with me in paradise."



This verse will take two entirely different meanings depending on where you put the comma. In Greek there are no commas, so when the Bible is translated into English the translator puts the comma where he thinks it should go. But if the translator believes in Greek type spirits that leave your body at death, he is going to put the comma after "you" before "today." The other place it can go, the correct place is after "today."



There are many examples of people saying "I tell you something today (right now)." It was a common way of speaking. Here are a few examples:



"Take to heart these words which I enjoin on you today" (Deuteronomy 6:6).



"besides setting up on Mount Ebal these stones concerning which I commanded you today" (Deuteronomy 27:4).



"Therefore, I declare to you today that I am innocent of the blood of all men" (Acts 20:26).



All these are excellent examples, but the best is Paul’s statement, "I declare to you today." It is identical to Jesus’ statement.



I say to you today = I declare to you today



Jesus and Paul are saying. "I am telling you this moment, right now."



Let’s see the consequences of both. If we use the first interpretation that the thief was in paradise with Jesus that day, then we run into the same problems that we had with the spirit of Jesus going to the Father. Jesus tells us three days after his burial that he has not yet been to the Father (John 20:17). He also tells us that he has been in the earth, not in paradise (John 12:32). If Jesus has not been to the Father, then how can we expect the thief to be in paradise with Jesus that very same day? Notice also that the thief asks Jesus to remember him when he comes into his kingdom.



The kingdom of God = Paradise



The kingdom of God has obviously not come yet. After Jesus resurrected, he appeared to the Apostles and instructed them on the kingdom of God for forty days (Acts 1:3). They then asked him:



"Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?" (Acts 1:6).



Even after the resurrection, the kingdom of God had still not come. So how could the thief have been in the kingdom on that very same day?



If we use the other way of interpreting this verse, it means that the thief asked Jesus to remember him when his kingdom comes. Jesus replies to him at that moment, that on that day, you will be with. With this interpretation there are no contradictions and we do not have to throw away 20 to 30 verses on death that will also contradict the previous interpretation.







Q. What about these two verses?



2 Corinthians 5:8 - "absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord"



and,



Philippians 1:23 - "I long to depart this life and be with Christ."







People have taken these two verses to mean that when you die you are automatically taken to heaven to be with Christ. The question that we must ask ourselves is, what does Paul mean when he says, "with Christ?" When does Paul expect to be with Christ? Is it immediately after death, or is it during the resurrection of the dead at the Second Coming of Christ? This is an easy question to answer if you know where to look, but first let’s takes a look at what a few sources say about this verse. The New American Bible states the following on 2 Corinthians chapter 5:



"Unlike the Greeks (philosophers), who found dissolution of the body desirable (cf Socrates), Paul has a Jewish horror of it."



The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible states the following on 2 Corinthians 5:8:



"Paul’s pithy statement, to be "absent from the body and to be present with the Lord," a statement pregnant with hope for all Christians, is understood to reflect an immediacy of sequence in the consciousness of the individual only. When a Christian closes his eyes in death, the next moment, as far as he is concerned, he will be with the Lord, though countless millennia may have intervened. Thus the basic structure of the New Testament, which is death followed by resurrection is preserved; at the sane time the postponement of the resurrection until the parousia, is maintained."



In other words, there is no sensation of time when you are dead. When you die, the next thing that you will experience is being with the Lord Jesus Christ on the day of his return, even though thousands of years have passed by.



Let us now go back and answer the question that we asked before, "When does Paul expect to be with the Lord?" The answer is in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 where Paul is speaking of the Second Coming of Christ:



"And the dead in Christ will rise first, then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. Thus we shall always be with the Lord."



This is when Paul expects to be with the Lord, at the resurrection of the dead at the return of Christ, not before then. Let us see another wonderful example of when Paul plans to be with Jesus.



2 Thessalonians 2:1 states:



"We ask you, brothers, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our assembly with him."



Again, we can see that Paul expects the Thessalonians and himself to assemble with Christ AT HIS COMING."



When you read the Bible you must always keep in mind who the writer was writing to and why. Paul in this example was not writing with the idea that his letter would become part of the New Testament for all to read for generations to come. He was writing to the church at Corinth and at Philippi that he had personally established. The churches at Corinth and Philippi were already familiar with the teachings of Paul on the return of Christ and the resurrection of the dead. This is why he did not mention the time period between death and the return of Christ. In the Bible, and when speaking with other Christians, many times we read or say that Jesus died and three days later he resurrected. Other times we say that Jesus died and resurrected. We do not mention the three days in between his death and resurrection because we both know what we are talking about. This is all that happened in these verses. Paul was writing to his churches, people whom he instructed personally, not to people that were unfamiliar with Christianity. They knew exactly what he was talking about. Here are a few examples:



"It is Christ Jesus who died, rather, was raised, who also is at the right hand of God, who intercedes for us" (Romans 8:34).



The same author Paul does not mention the three days from Jesus’ death till his resurrection, but we all know that he is not implying that Jesus died and rose immediately. Paul is just omitting an obvious fact. 1 Peter 3:22 states:



"But an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God."



Peter does not mention the forty days in between the resurrection and his ascension that Jesus was with the Apostles before going to heaven to sit at the right hand of God. It is because the people that Peter was writing to were familiar with this fact already.











Q. What about Luke 16:19-31 - The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus?



A lot of people have used this parable as the sole basis for their doctrine on death. They will quote this one verse and completely ignore all the verses that have been covered in this paper. This is an irresponsible way of interpreting Scripture. You should never make a conclusion out of one verse, but instead compare all the related verses on that topic before making your conclusions. In this case, the situation is made worse by the fact that the verse that is used to create an entire doctrine of death happens to be a parable. All major Bible scholars consider this to be a parable. Let’s see what a parable is. According to the New American Bible under a section entitled Literary Genres or Forms, it states:



Parable – A short fictitious narrative from which a moral or spiritual truth is drawn. Keep in mind that the point of the parable (not the details) is God’s message to believers.



Parables are fictitious, they have never happened. They are meant to teach us a point. We cannot take this parable literally. If we do, it will contradict everything in the Bible that teaches us that you will receive your reward or punishment on judgment day and not before, and everything that we have covered on death. The biggest clue that this is not a literal passage is that the rich man is speaking from the netherworld. When I looked up Netherworld in the New American Bible Dictionary it said, "See Sheol."



Sheol – The ancient concept of the abode of the dead (the netherworld, in Hebrew, Sheol) supposed no activity or lofty emotion among the deceased, who were pictured as surrounded but the darkness of oblivion.



The rich man is speaking from the netherworld, he is displaying torment, and he is pleading with Abraham in order to help himself and save his brothers. These are impossibilities from the netherworld. In the netherworld there is no activity or emotion among the deceased, they are in oblivion. Yet the rich man displays both of them. If we do take it literally it will make no sense whatsoever. We will also have the poor man on Abraham’s chest, spirits that have actual eyes and tongues, plus the righteous and the wicked can see and speak to each other. This is bizarre!



This parable is not intended to teach us about death. Unfortunately many interpreters have made this parable the sole authority on death. The reason that they have misinterpreted this verse is that they bring with them a lot of baggage (preconceived ideas) which hide from them the true meaning of this verse and leads them to an incorrect conclusion. Please approach this parable with a mind set free from prior influences and the truth will be obvious. If you approach this with the mind set that this is about death, then that’s what you will find.



In order to understand a parable you must always be aware of the context of the verses before and after the parable. These usually provide you with clues to what the point of the parable is about. In this case only the preceding verses are helpful. This parable has two points, one primary and a secondary. So let’s see what this most controversial parable is about.



Jesus gives us this parable because of the conflict that he is having with the Pharisees over their love of money, their use of "dishonest wealth." This thought started in the Parable of the Dishonest Steward in Luke 16:1 and continued until Luke 16:15 which a few verses later led up to the Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus. In Luke 16:13-14 Jesus says:



"No servant can serve two masters. He will either hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon (money). The Pharisees who loved money, heard all these things and sneered at him."



All the Parables of the Bible states on this verse:



"These religious leaders who fared sumptuously, living in the love of money, and of the enjoyments which money purchased, only mocked at the counsel of using their wealth for the benefit of others in a way to earn them eternal rewards. Their money was theirs and they wanted no advice from Jesus as to its right use. Then came this parable."



The main point of this parable is to show the consequences of making money your god, putting it first in your life instead of putting the will of God first. The sin of the rich man was not that he was rich, but that he failed to realize that he was God’s trustee, with wealth and influence that could have been used for God’s glory, and for the spiritual and material benefit of his fellow-men. Lazarus was rewarded because in spite of his pitiful condition, he had served God, finding his constant help in Him.



In a similar twist, The Quest Study Bible states on this verse:



"His point was that, contrary to popular opinion, money is not evidence of favor with God, nor does poverty indicate God’s displeasure."



Its secondary point is to teach us that even after Jesus’ resurrection, men will still refuse to repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. Verse 31 says:



"Then Abraham said, if they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they repent if someone should rise from the dead."



Let’s take a look at what The New American Bible states on this verse:



"A foreshadowing in Luke’s gospel of the rejection of the call to repentance even after Jesus’ resurrection."



Now that we understand the reason and the point of the parable, let us examine the details of this parable that have been disastrously misinterpreted. We will start with verse 22:



"When the poor man died he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham."



What does the "bosom of Abraham mean?" According to Thayer’s Greek Lexicon bosom as it is used in this verse means: To be a partaker of the same blessedness as Abraham in paradise.



So Lazarus will share the same reward with Abraham in paradise. God blessed Abraham by promising him that he would inherit the world (the kingdom of God). Romans 4:13 states:



"It was not through the law that the promise was made to Abraham and his descendants that he would inherit the world, but through the righteousness that comes through faith."



Abraham has not inherited the world yet, he will first have to be resurrected. When will the resurrection occur? At the coming of the new age, the Second Coming of Christ. Luke 20:35 states:



"But those who are deemed worthy to attain to the coming age and to the resurrection of the dead."



Lazarus was carried away by angels to be with Abraham. When are the angel supposed to collect the elect? At the coming of Christ at the end of the age in order to enter the kingdom of God. Matthew13:39-42 states it clearly:



"The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels. Just as weeds are collected and burned up (destroyed) with fire, so will it be at the end of the age." The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will collect out of his kingdom all who cause others to sin and all evildoers. They will throw them into the fiery furnace (to be destroyed as the weeds were destroyed).



Matthew 13: 49 follows six parables on the kingdom of God, the Parable of the Sower, the Weeds, the Mustard Seed, the Treasure, the Pearl, and the Net Thrown into the Sea. It is still dealing with the same topic, the kingdom of God. It states:



"Thus it will be at the end of the age. The angels will go out and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the fiery furnace where there will be wailing and grinding of teeth."



Both of these events, Abraham’s blessing and the collection of the righteous by the angels are events that will happen in the future, at the return of Christ. Let’s continue and then we will put it all together. Verse 22-23 states:



"The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side."



The rich man and Lazarus are not in the same place, one is in the kingdom of God and the other is in the netherworld. When the rich man sees Abraham "far off" it means that he sees him far off in time not in distance. This parable is pretending that the rich man from his grave in the present time is having a vision of Abraham (in the kingdom of God) in the future after the angels have collected the elect and the dead have been resurrected, and realizes that he is still in the grave and has missed out on the blessings of Abraham.



He is in torment because he realizes that he will not have life in the age to come because he has been thrown into the fiery flames (destroyed).



The rich man then asks Abraham to send Lazarus to his brothers in the present time to warn them so that they will not suffer the same fate as him in the future. Verse 27 states:



"Then I beg you, father, send him (Lazarus) to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. So that he may warn them."



But Lazarus in the present time is also dead. When Abraham says in verse 29, " They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them." The rich man replies in verse 30:



"He said, Oh no father Abraham, but if someone (Lazarus from verse 27) from the dead goes to them they will repent."



Where is Lazarus? He is dead in Sheol. This is why the rich man says that, "If someone from the dead comes they will repent." He will be in the kingdom next to Abraham after the resurrection when the Son of Man comes and sends his angels to collect the dead in Christ.



Of course this verse foreshadows Jesus’ resurrection, but it is here speaking specifically about Lazarus.



Summary – You cannot serve two masters at once. If you choose the things of this world (i.e. money) over God, when Christ returns and inaugurates the kingdom of God you will be counted with the wicked and will not share in the inheritance (bosom) of Abraham. You will instead be thrown into the fiery flames and destroyed.



Remember that this is a parable, and a parable is a fictitious short story with a point. The details are not important, only the point. This parable was not meant to be the sole authority on death. It does however detail the end results correctly. Either we enter the kingdom of God or we are destroyed forever.







Q. What about 2 Kings 2:11: "And Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind."







This verse has of course been taken to mean that Elijah went to heaven and then so will we when we die. The Jewish word that is translated as heaven literally means, "sky." I will explain this verse by saying that what happened to Elijah was not that he was taken up to heaven where God dwells, but that he was translated to another location on earth. This explanation is very easy to prove. Read 1 Kings 18:7-16 where Elijah is speaking to Obadiah, King Ahab’s vizier. We see in verse 8 that Elijah asks Obadiah to go and tell Ahab that Elijah is here. Obadiah replies that there is no nation or kingdom that Ahab has not searched for Elijah in, and that they could not find him. In verse12 Obadiah says to Elijah that he is afraid to go and tell Ahab that Elijah is here because when he leaves, the Spirit of the LORD will carry him off somewhere that he does not know, and Ahab will have him killed.



"After I leave you, the Spirit of the LORD will carry you to some place I do not know, and when I go to inform Ahab and he does not find you, he will have me killed."



Being translated is not too common in the Bible but it does happen. Philip was translated in Acts 8:39:



"When they came out of the water, The Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away and the eunuch saw him no more."



Another excellent verse to show that Elijah is still on earth after the event on the chariot of fire is that he writes a letter to King Jehoram in 2 Chronicles 21:10-13 telling him that the LORD will strike his people with a great plague. Verse 12 is worth quoting:



"He (Jehoram) received a letter from the prophet Elijah with this message."



The crucial point in these verses is that Elijah wrote a letter to King Jehoram who was the son of King Jehoshaphat. Elijah was transported during the reign of King Jehoshaphat. Jehoram came after Jehoshaphat, and it was Jehoram that received a letter from Elijah. The obvious conclusion is that Elijah is still alive here on earth. If Elijah did go to heaven, then how could we explain Jesus’ statement in John 3:13:



"No one has gone up to heaven."



Is Jesus wrong? Or is it that man’s interpretation of this verse is wrong?







Q. What about Enoch?



The problem with Enoch is two-fold. The first is in Genesis 5:24, it states:



"Then Enoch walked with God, and he was no longer here, for God took him."



In order to understand this verse you will have to read all of chapter five. People claim that since of everyone else it is said, "then he died" and of Enoch it is not, but instead it says that he "walked with God, for God took him," then that means that Enoch went to heaven with God. If you read the paragraph that talks about Enoch without this preconceived idea, you will come to the conclusion that Enoch died.



It says in verse 23:



"That the whole lifetime of Enoch was three hundred and sixty-five years."



To me that implies that Enoch’s whole lifetime was three hundred and sixty-five years and then he died. I do not see any hint that Enoch did not die. It says that "Enoch walked with God," but so did Noah in Genesis 6:10:



"Noah, a good man and blameless in that age, for he walked with God."



"Walked with God," means that the person follows God’s will. "God took him," means that God took his breath of life and that person died. We still use this saying today, we commonly say that God took a family member or a friend when we mean that someone died. The word translated as "took" is the Hebrew word laqah. It means:



laqah – of removal by death.







An excellent example of the usage of this word is in Ezekiel 33:6:



"But if the watchman sees the sword coming and fails to blow the warning trumpet, so that the sword comes and takes (laqah) anyone, I will hold the watchman responsible for that person’s death, even though that person is taken (laqah) because of their own sin."



Notice how it is used, the sword comes and takes someone, in other words, kills someone. This is why the watchman will be held responsible for that person’s death.



So why is there a difference between the phrases of all the other people mentioned and Enoch? There is no clear-cut answer, but my opinion is that something happened to Enoch that cut his life short. Either an accident or illness, but something that prevented him from dying of old age like the others. Everyone mentioned lived to over nine hundred years old, except Lamech who lived to almost eight hundred years old. However, Enoch only lived to be three hundred and sixty-five years old. Something happened to Enoch that cut his life short; this is why it is said, "God took him."



The second verse is in Hebrews 11:5 where Paul is speaking about the faith of the ancients. It says:



"By faith Enoch was taken up so that he should not see death, and he was found no more because God had taken him."



The problem that we arrive at if we say that because of this verse Enoch did not die, is that the same author in the same chapter in verse 13 says that all the ancients that he was talking about (which Enoch was one of) have died:



"All these died in faith."



So Abraham and Noah and Enoch and all the others mentioned died. So how do we explain verse 5? The clue is in knowing what the author meant when he said "That he should not see death." I have not found the answer to that question. Obviously he does not mean that he did not die because he writes a few verses later that he did die. In John 8:51 Jesus says:



"I say to you, whoever keeps my word will never see death."



This is identical to Hebrews 11:5. I do not think that Jesus meant that whoever keeps his word will be taken to heaven without ever experiencing death. It is more likely that Jesus means that whoever keeps his word will not experience eternal death. That they will be resurrected on the last day. Hebrews 11:5 meaning is probably along these lines.



For me, I am convinced that Enoch did die. I cannot let one verse that I cannot explain fully counter all the evidence in the massive amount of verses that are very specific on death.



Paul who wrote Hebrews says in Romans 5:12:



"Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned"



Death came to all men, that includes Enoch. This statement of Paul also strengthens the position of Hebrews 11:13 "They all died in faith."



If we isolate Enoch from all the evidence on death, the preponderance of the evidence is about 75% in favor that Enoch died, and 25% that he did not see death. If we do not isolate Enoch from all the other Scriptures on death Enoch is really not a factor.



If Enoch went to heaven, then again, we have to assume that Jesus was wrong in John 3:13:



"No one has gone up to heaven."











Q. What about the transfiguration of Jesus?



The transfiguration of Jesus is a vision, it is a way in which God reveals a message to us. Jesus in speaking about the transfiguration says in Matthew 17:9:



"As they were coming down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, ‘Do not tell the vision to anyone until the Son of Man has been raised from the dead."



A vision is not reality, it is a way in which God communicates or instructs us. In the transfiguration, the message was intended for Peter, James, and John.







Let’s take a look at some other visions. Genesis 15:1 says:



"After these things the word of the LORD came to Abraham in a vision."



"Daniel had a dream as he lay in bed, and was terrified by the visions of his mind" (Daniel 7:1).



Daniel then goes on to describe his vision which includes four beasts, one that looks like a lion with eagle wings etc. This is an excellent example of a vision. God is revealing a message to Daniel, the details are not necessarily reality, it is the message that is important. The message in this case is about the end times. God many times uses symbols to get his point across. But there are not going to be four actual beasts that look like a lion with eagle wings etc.



The purpose of the vision of the transfiguration was to confirm to Peter, James, and John that Jesus is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets. The New American Bible states on this verse:



"Moses and Elijah represent respectively law and prophecy in the Old Testament and are linked to Mount Sinai. They now appear with Jesus as witnesses to the fulfillment of the law and prophets taking place in the person of Jesus as he appears in glory."



It was a vision. It would be irresponsible to use this episode for any other purpose than what it was intended for.



There are a few more verses that might cause a little confusion, but they are easily explained.



The Bible is very clear on the subjects we have covered in this brief paper. Man made traditions have done everything possible to confuse God’s word, but it is very easy to see past the lies if one just takes the time to look. Once you understand these important points, a lot of the Bible starts to make sense, because it stops contradicting itself. You are no longer trying to force Greek thought into Hebrew writings. Think about it, if you believe that you go to heaven after you die, how would you explain all the verses in this paper without making a shamble out of the Bible?







God bless you and see you at the resurrection!





If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact us at:









767juan@compuserve.com











BACK HOME

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

A Brief Look At The Worship And Glorification of Yahshua

A friend put this to me:  "I had a friend read your page and he said that he's heard your sort of perspectives before but also suggested  wouldn't it be wrong for Yeshua to allow people to worship him if he were not divine? He was refereing to the time when Christ entered Jeruselm before the crucifixion. What is your thought?"

I love these sincere questions and thought I'd share our answer here for others to consider.

First, about divinity. This is where the concordance comes in. In the NT you'll find the word divinity means "godlike." Well, Yahshua IS like our elohim, more so than any of us, though we are also made in Yah's image and called to be just like Him. I do believe Yahshua is divine. The problem is that most people see "divine" and "deity" as the same thing. LIKE god is not the same thing as GOD. So, really what we question is the teaching that Messiah is deity. IS he Yahweh, or just LIKE Yahweh?

The issue of worship is a fun one, I think you'll like it. Again, we use the concordance:

Hebrew 7812
שׁחה
shâchâh

(pronouced) shaw-khaw'

A primitive root; to depress, that is, prostrate (especially reflexively in homage to royalty or God): - bow (self) down, crouch, fall down (flat), humbly beseech, do (make) obeisance, do reverence, make to stoop, worship.
Greek 4352
προσκυνέω
proskuneō
(pronounced) pros-koo-neh'-o

From G4314 and probably a derivative of G2965 (meaning to kiss, like a dog licking his master’s hand); to fawn or crouch to, that is, (literally or figuratively) prostrate oneself in homage (do reverence to, adore): - worship.

Nothing mysterious here. For starters, he wasn't being worshiped as elohim, but as king. And wasn't it right for Yahshua, the rightful king, the much anticipated anointed one, to receive the homage due him? Consider these verses:

Mat 2:2 "Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east, and have come to worship Him."

Heb 1:6 And when He again brings the first-born into the world, He says, "AND LET ALL THE ANGELS OF GOD WORSHIP HIM."

Being a humble man, he never sought worship, but always pointed to the Father, and others were quick to worship Yahweh because of Yahshua.

Joh 4:21 Jesus said to her, "Woman, believe Me, an hour is coming when neither in this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, shall you worship the Father.
Joh 4:22 "You worship that which you do not know; we worship that which we know, for salvation is from the Jews.
Joh 4:23 "But an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth; for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers.
Joh 4:24 "Elohim is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth."

A look at the word "glorified" is helpful, too.

Greek 1392
δοξάζω
doxazō
(pronounced) dox-ad'-zo
From G1391; to render (or esteem) glorious (in a wide application): - (make) glorify (-ious), full of (have) glory, honour, magnify.

Mat 9:8 But when the multitudes saw this, they were filled with awe, and glorified Elohim, who had given such authority to men.  (Note "to MEN")

Mat 15:31 so that the multitude marveled as they saw the dumb speaking, the crippled restored, and the lame walking, and the blind seeing; and they glorified the elohim of Israel

Yahweh intended to glorify Yahshua...

Joh 7:39 But this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Yahshua was not yet glorified.

Joh 11:4 But when Yahshua heard it, He said, "This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of Elohim, that the Son of Elohim may be glorified by it."

Joh 12:16 These things His disciples did not understand at the first; but when Yahshua was glorified, then they remembered that these things were written of Him, and that they had done these things to Him.

Joh 12:23 And Jesus answered them, saying, "The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified.

But always turned the glory back to his Father...

Joh 12:28 "Father, glorify Thy name." There came therefore a voice out of heaven: "I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again."

Joh 13:31 When therefore he had gone out, Yahshua said, "Now is the Son of Man glorified, and Elohim is glorified in Him;
Joh 13:32 if Elohim is glorified in Him, Elohim will also glorify Him in Himself, and will glorify Him immediately.

Joh 14:13 "And whatever you ask in My name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.

Joh 17:3 "And this is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true Elohim, and Yahshua Messiah whom Thou hast sent.
Joh 17:4 "I glorified Thee on the earth, having accomplished the work which Thou hast given Me to do.

I love this last one because it makes the whole thing abundantly clear. Especially, "that they may know thee, the ONLY true elohim, AND Yahshua Messiah whom thou hast sent." The gospel acredited to John (though  more likely written by Lazarus) is all about love and glory!

Act 3:13 "The Elohim of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Elohim of our fathers, has glorified His servant Yahshua, the one whom you delivered up, and disowned in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him.

1Pe 4:11 Whoever speaks, let him speak, as it were, the utterances of Elohim; whoever serves, let him do so as by the strength which Elohim supplies; so that in all things Elohim may be glorified through Yahshua Messiah, to whom belongs the glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.

Anyway, there's tons more, but you get the idea. Do note that there was a time that Yahshua WAS NOT glorified. His hour hadn't come yet. If he were Yahweh in the flesh, he would have been a glorified being from the beginning, wouldn't he?

Whatcha think?

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Why I Don't Go To Church Anymore

I found the following article as a link on the sidebar of a blog I read.  My usual disclaimer applies - I haven't read anything else at this website and don't know anything about them, so follow links at your own discretion (always!).  That said, I thought this piece was very well written, kind of speaks my thoughts (in a more gentle fashion than I could write), and might hit the spot for some of you.  Enjoy.

Why I Don't Go To Church Anymore: Living in the Relational Church - Part 6

By Wayne Jacobsen
BodyLife • May 2001

Dear Fellow-believer,

I do appreciate your concern for me and your willingness to raise issues that have caused you concern. I know the way I relate to the church is a bit unconventional and some even call it dangerous. Believe me, I understand that concern because I used to think that way myself and even taught others to as well.

If you are happy with the status quo of organized religion today, you may not like what you read here. My purpose is not to convince you to see this incredible church the same way I do, but to answer your questions as openly and honestly as I can. Even if we don't end up agreeing, hopefully you will understand that our differences need not estrange us as members of Christ's body.

Where do you go to church?

I have never liked this question, even when I was able to answer it with a specific organization. I know what it means culturally, but it is based on a false premise--that church is something you can go to as in a specific event, location or organized group. I think Jesus looks at the church quite differently. He didn't talk about it as a place to go to, but a way of living in relationship to him and to other followers of his.

Asking me where I go to church is like asking me where I go to Jacobsen. How do I answer that? I am a Jacobsen and where I go a Jacobsen is. 'Church' is that kind of word. It doesn't identify a location or an institution. It describes a people and how they relate to each other. If we lose sight of that, our understanding of the church will be distorted and we'll miss out on much of its joy.

Are you just trying to avoid the question?

I know it may only sound like quibbling over words, but words are important. When we only ascribe the term 'church' to weekend gatherings or institutions that have organized themselves as 'churches' we miss out on what it means to live as Christ's body. It will give us a false sense of security to think that by attending a meeting once a week we are participating in God's church. Conversely I hear people talk about 'leaving the church' when they stop attending a specific congregation.

But if the church is something we are, not someplace we go, how can we leave it unless we abandon Christ himself? And if I think only of a specific congregation as my part of the church, haven't I separated myself from a host of other brothers and sisters that do not attend the same one I do?

The idea that those who gather on Sunday mornings to watch a praise concert and listen to a teaching are part of the church and those who do not, are not, would be foreign to Jesus. The issue is not where we are at a given time during the weekend, but how we are living in him and with other believers all week long.

But don't we need regular fellowship?

I wouldn't say we need it. If we were in a place where we couldn't find other believers, Jesus certainly would be able to take care of us. Thus, I'd phrase that a bit differently: Will people who are growing to know the Living God also desire real and meaningful connections with other believers? Absolutely! The call to the kingdom is not a call to isolation. Every person I've ever met who is thriving in the life of Jesus has a desire to share authentic fellowship with other believers. They realize that whatever they know of God's life is just in part, and only the fullest revelation of him is in the church.

But sometimes that kind of fellowship is not easy to find. Periodically on this journey we may go through times when we can't seem to find any other believers who share our hunger. That's especially true for those who find that conforming to the expectations of the religious institutions around them diminishes their relationship with Jesus. They may find themselves excluded by believers with whom they've shared close friendship. But no one going through that looks on that time as a treat. It is incredibly painful and they will look for other hungry believers to share the journey with.

My favorite expression of body life is where a local group of people chooses to walk together for a bit of the journey by cultivating close friendships and learning how to listen to God together.

Shouldn't we be committed to a local fellowship?

That has been said so often today, that most of us assume it is in the Bible somewhere. I haven't found it yet. Many of us have been led to believe that we can't possibly survive without the 'covering of the body' and will either fall into error or backslide into sin. But doesn't that happen inside our local congregations as well?

I know many people who live outside those structures and find not only an ever-deepening relationship with God, but also connections with other believers that run far deeper than they found in the institution. I haven't lost any of my passion for Jesus or my affection for his church. If anything those have grown by leaps and bounds in recent years.

Scripture does encourage us to be devoted to one another not committed to an institution. Jesus indicated that whenever two or three people get together focused on him, they would experience the vitality of church life.

Is it helpful to regularly participate in a local expression of that reality? Of course. But we make a huge mistake when we assume that fellowship takes place just because we attend the same event together, even regularly, or because we belong to the same organization. Fellowship happens where people share the journey of knowing Jesus together. It consists of open, honest sharing, genuine concern about each other's spiritual well being and encouragement for people to follow Jesus however he leads them.

But don't our institutions keep us from error?

I'm sorry to burst your bubble here, but every major heresy that has been inflicted on God's people for the last 2,000 years has come from organized groups with 'leaders' who thought they knew God's mind better than anyone around them. Conversely, virtually every move of God among people hungering for him was rejected by the 'church' of that day and were excluded, excommunicated or executed for following God.

If that is where you hope to find security, I'm afraid it is sorely misplaced. Jesus didn't tell us that 'going to church' would keep us safe, but that trusting him would. He gave us an anointing of the Spirit so that we would know the difference between truth and error. That anointing is cultivated as we learn his ways in his Word and grow closer to his heart. It will help you recognize when expressions of church you share life with becomes destructive to his work in you.

So are traditional congregations wrong?

Absolutely not! I have found many of them with people who love God and are seeking to grow in his ways. I visit a couple of dozen different congregations a year that I find are far more centered on relationship than religion. Jesus is at the center of their life together, and those who act as leaders are true servants and not playing politics of leadership, so that all are encouraged to minister to one another.

I pray that even more of them are renewed in a passion for Jesus, a genuine concern for each other and a willingness to serve the world with God's love. But I think we'd have to admit that these are rare in our communities and many only last for a short span before they unwittingly look to institutional answers for the needs of the body instead of remaining dependent on Jesus. When that happens do not feel condemned if God leads you not to go along with them.

So should I stop going to church, too?

I'm afraid that question also misses the point. You see I don't believe you're going to church any more than I am. We're just part of it. Be your part, however Jesus calls you to and wherever he places you. Not all of us grow in the same environment.

If you gather with a group of believers at a specific time and place and that participation helps you grow closer to Jesus and allows you to follow his work in you, by all means don't think you have to leave. Keep in mind, however, that of itself is not the church. It is just one of many expressions of it in the place where you live.

Don't be tricked into thinking that just because you attend its meetings you are experiencing real body life. That only comes as God connects you with a handful of brothers and sisters with whom you can build close friendships and share the real ups and downs of this journey.

That can happen among traditional congregations, as it can also happen beyond them. In the last seven years I've meet hundreds if not thousands of people who have grown disillusioned with traditional congregations and are thriving spiritually as they share God's life with others, mostly in their homes.

Then meeting in homes is the answer?

Of course not. But let's be clear: as fun as it is to enjoy large group worship and even be instructed by gifted teachers, the real joy of body life can't be shared in huge groups. The church for its first 300 years found the home the perfect place to gather. They are much more suited to the dynamics of family which is how Jesus described his body.

But meeting in homes is no cure-all. I've been to some very sick home meetings and met in facilities with groups who shared an authentic body life together. But the time I spend in regular body life I want to spend face to face with a group of people. I know it isn't popular today where people find it is far easier to sit through a finely-tuned (or not so finely-tuned) service and go home without ever having to open up our life or care about another person's journey.

But ultimately what matters most to me is not where or how they meet, but whether or not people are focused on Jesus and really helping each other on the journey to becoming like him. Meetings are less the issue here than the quality of relationships. I am always looking for people like that wherever I am and always rejoice when I find it. In our new home in Oxnard, we've found a few folks and are hopeful to find even more.

Aren't you just reacting out of hurt?

I suppose that is possible and time will tell, I guess, but I honestly don't believe so. Anyone who is engaged in real body life will get hurt at times. But there are two kinds of hurt. There's the kind of pain that points to a problem that can be fixed with the right care - such as a badly sprained ankle. Then there's the kind of pain that can only be fixed by pulling away - as when you put your hand on a hot stove.

Perhaps all of us have experienced some measure of pain as we have tried to fit God's life into institutions. For a long time most of us hung in there hoping if we tweaked a few things it would get better. Though we could be successful in limited ways during moments of renewal, we also discovered that eventually the conformity an institution demands and the freedom people need to grow in Christ are at odds with one another. It has happened with virtually every group formed throughout the history of Christianity.

Are you looking for the perfect church?

No, and I don't anticipate finding one this side of eternity. Perfection is not my goal, but finding people with God's priorities. It's one thing for people to struggle toward an ideal they share together. It's another to realize that our ideals have little in common.

I make no secret of the fact that I am deeply troubled by the state of organized Christianity. Most of what we call 'church' today are nothing more than well-planned performances with little actual connection between believers. Believers are encouraged toward a growing dependency on the system or its leadership rather than on Jesus himself. We spend more energy conforming behavior to what the institution needs rather than helping people be transformed at the foot of the cross!

I'm tired of trying to fellowship with people who only view church as a two-hour a week dumping ground for guilt while they live the rest of the week with the same priorities as the world. I'm tired of those who depend on their own works of righteousness but who have no compassion for the people of the world. I'm tired of insecure people using the Body of Christ as an extension of their own ego and will manipulate it to satisfy their own needs. I'm tired of sermons more filled with the bondage of religion than the freedom of God's love and where relationships take a back seat to the demands of an efficient institution.

But don't our children need church activities?

I'd suggest that what they need most is to be integrated into God's life through relational fellowship with other believers. 92% of children who grow up in Sunday schools with all the puppets and high-powered entertainment, leave 'church' when they leave their parents' home? Instead of filling our children with ethics and rules we need to demonstrate how to live in God's life together.

Even sociologists tell us that the #1 factor in determining whether a child will thrive in society is if they have deep, personal friendships with nonrelative adults. No Sunday school can fill that role. I know of one community in Australia who after 20 years of sharing God's life together as families could say that they had not lost one child to the faith as they grew into adulthood. I know I cut across the grain here, but it is far more important that our children experience real fellowship among believers rather than the bells and whistles of a slick children's program.

What dynamics of body life do you look for?

I'm always looking for a people who are seeking to follow the Living Christ. He is at the center of their lives, their affections and their conversation. They look to be authentic and free others to hurt when they hurt, to question what they question and to follow his voice without others accusing them of being divisive or rebellious. I look for people who are not wasting their money on extravagant buildings or flashy programs; where people sitting next to each other are not strangers; and where they all participate as a priesthood to God instead of watch passively from a safe distance.

Aren't you giving people an excuse to sit home and do nothing?

I hope not, though I know it is a danger. I realize some people who leave traditional congregations end up abusing that freedom to satisfy their own desires and thus miss out on church life altogether. Neither am I a fan of 'church hoppers', who whip around to one place after another looking for the latest fad or the best opportunity to fulfill their own selfish desires.

But most of the people I meet and talk with are not outside the system because they have lost their passion for Jesus or his people, but only because the traditional congregations near them couldn't satisfy their hunger for relationship. They are seeking authentic expressions of body life and pay an incredible cost to seek it out. Believe me, we would all find it easier just to go with the flow, but once you've tasted of living fellowship between passionate believers, it is impossible to settle for anything less.

Isn't this view of church divisive?

Not of itself. People make it divisive when they demand that people conform to their revelation of truth. Most of us on the journey are accused of being divisive because freedom can be threatening to those who find their security in a religious system. But must of us aren't trying to recruit others to leave their congregations. We see the body of Christ big enough to encompass God's people however he calls them to gather.

One of the things often said about traditional church is that Sunday morning is the most segregated hour in American culture. We only meet with people who look like we do and like things the way we do. I've found now that I have far more opportunity to get with people from a broader cross-section of his body. I don't demand others do it my way and I hope in time that those who see it differently will stop demanding we conform to theirs.

Where can I find that kind of fellowship?

There's no easy answer here. It might be right in front of you among the fellowship you're already in. It might be down the street in your neighborhood or across a cubicle at work. You can also get involved in compassionate outreaches to the needy and broken in your locality as a way to live out his life in you and meet others with a similar hunger.

Don't expect this kind of fellowship to fall easily into an organization. It is organic, and Jesus can lead you to it right where you are. Look for him to put a dozen or so folks around your life with whom you can share the journey. They may not even all go to the same congregation you do. They might be neighbors or coworkers who are following after God. Wouldn't that kind of interconnection among God's people yield some incredible fruit?

Don't expect it to be easy or run smoothly. It will take some specific choices on our part to be obedient to Jesus. It may take some training to shake off old habits and be free to let him build his community around you, but it is all worth it. I know it bothers some people that I don't take my regular place in a pew on Sunday morning, but I can tell you absolutely that my worst days outside organized religion are still better than my best days inside it. To me the difference is like listening to someone talk about golf or actually taking a set of clubs out to a course and playing golf. Being his church is like that. In our day we don't need more talk about the church, but people who are simply ready to live in its reality.

People all over the world are freshly discovering how to do that again. You can be one of them as you let him place you in his body as he desires.
--------------------------------
BodyLife is published periodically by Lifestream Ministries and is sent free of charge to anyone who requests it. For those with email we recommend our web-based version so that we can hold down costs and get it to you much more quickly. This is especially important for international subscribers.

© Copyright 2010 Lifestream Ministries

Permission is herby granted to anyone wishing to make copies for free distribution.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Is Yahshua Actually Yahweh in the Flesh?

There is soooo much here, folks.  More than we could possibly share in one, or even a dozen, blog entries.  With your bible, your concordance, and a sincere desire to know the truth, you can learn as much as you want on this topic - please don't limit yourself to our writings!  Our purpose in sharing this is two-fold.  One, we just want to whet your appetite.  Two, we are so excited!

Because there is so much to cover, we thought we'd start by sharing portions of a letter we wrote to a friend.  We had sent our friend a letter covering basically what I covered in my "Being Berean - The Trinity" post, as well as a list of 100 scriptures that prove Yahshua isn't Yahweh in the flesh (you can find the list here - note, we do not affiliate with the folks who put this site together - in fact, we don't know much about them at all - just happened across this page). Below you'll find the questions our friend responded with, as well as our answers (and whatever we have to add to make it clear for our blog readers).   Enjoy!
-----------------------------------------

Sorry if we weren't entirely clear last time. It's taken us some time ourselves to weed through the details of various doctrines (a label comes with certain assumptions that may not be accurate) and get to the bottom of the issue. For instance, are divinity and deity the same thing? What is sovereignty? What is meant by oneness? Can someone be 100% man and 100% elohim?

We have come to believe that Yahshua is not Yahweh in the flesh. (That right there would have us stoned in many Constantinian churches!)  We do believe Yahshua is the savior and messiah that Yahweh provided for us. We do believe he is from Yahweh and therefore divine. We do not believe he IS Yahweh and therefore is not deity, as Yahweh alone holds that title. We believe Yahshua is 100% man and therefore cannot be any percent deity. More on that later. We also believe he is sovereign, as his kingship was given to him by the Father.

Now you have even more questions. But let's get to your letter...

Savior


Should our redemption then be found in man whose breath is in his nostrils (Is 2.22) rather than our salvation being in Yahweh, maker of heaven and earth?

You mentioned these:

Isa 45:17 Israel has been saved by YHWH with an everlasting salvation; You will not be put to shame or humiliated To all eternity.

Isa 45:22 "Turn to Me, and be saved, all the ends of the earth; For I am Elohim, and there is no other.

There are also these, and probably more:

Isa 43:11 "I, even I, am YHWH; And there is no savior besides Me.

Hos 13:4 Yet I have been YHWH your Elohim Since the land of Egypt; And you were not to know any elohim except Me, For there is no savior besides Me.

And when we consider passages that show Messiah to be our savior, it seems reasonable that they (Yahweh and Yahshua) must be one and the same entity, since we cannot have two elohim. However, we found that neither of them hold exclusively the title of savior in scripture. Consider:

2Ki 13:5 And YHWH gave Israel a savior, so that they went out from under the hand of the Syrians: and the children of Israel dwelt in their tents, as beforetime.

Neh 9:27 Therefore thou deliveredst them into the hand of their enemies, who vexed them: and in the time of their trouble, when they cried unto thee, thou heardest them from heaven; and according to thy manifold mercies thou gavest them saviours, who saved them out of the hand of their enemies.

Oba 1:21 And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be Yahweh’s.


None of these refer to Yahshua or Yahweh as savior, as far as we can see, and some of these are even pluralized. Sometimes the sending of saviors is seen as occurring in the past (for instance in the verse from Nehemiah), thus providing further evidence that the saviors being referred to were NOT the Messiah prophesied elsewhere as a future event.

So we know that Yahweh is our savior, the question then is how does he save? Apparently it’s not unusual for him to raise men up to do the job. The Hebrew word used in all these references is "yasha" (H3467). Yahshua is the promised savior of Israel in the NT - Acts 5:31, 13:23. We don't see a conflict here, nor do we see that they have to be the same entity.


From Eternity


But as for you Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity." Micah 5:2

This very verse says that from Judah one will go forth for Yahweh to be ruler. In his "goings forth" from long ago, we found that the Strong's word used there can also mean "family descent," which to us seems to fit better with the whole of scripture. Thus, the verse would read, "His family descent is from long ago, from the days of eternity." Luke 3 shows us that Messiah's lineage does indeed go back to Yahweh (specifically vs 38), including Judah.



Was Yahshua from eternity or 100% man through Joseph and Mary.
Um.... Yes. =)

Hebrews 7 seems to say Yahshua was Melchizadek.

We don't know a lot about Melchizadek. We've heard that he was one and the same as Yahshua, but we're learning to question everything we've heard! We do note in Hebrews 7 that he was made like the son of Elohim. Also, vs. 11 says there was another priest of the order of Melchizedek. That, along with the fact that Yahshua does have a genealogy, parents, beginning of days and end of life, makes us think they can be nothing but separate beings. Anyway, there seems to be a lot in the (endless!) genealogies that we have yet to unpack, but if we start with examining the virgin birth, it does narrow down the options.


The virgin will be with child...



Isa 7:14 "Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.


The fact that millions of women have become pregnant and have given birth by means of their husbands is not an amazing sign but rather the way of reproducing mankind. For it to be a sign of any significance it seems to need to be out of the ordinary.



(From Bobby's notes)

We've read that the earliest accounts of Matthew and Luke said nothing of the virgin birth. Here is why I believe that to be true: First of all Matthew supposedly quotes Isaiah 7:14 as a messianic prophecy. You've already recognized that the word "virgin" could mean maiden:

almah (H5959) possible to be virgin, but usually maiden or young woman.

betulah (H1330) impossible to be anything but virgin


Yet, the issue of the Hebrew word almah is unimportant compared to the context of Isaiah 7:14, for it is firmly and irrefutably placed in Isaiah and it doesn't seem possible it could be legitimately used anywhere as a messianic prophecy.

The facts seen from the context of Isaiah 7:1 - 8:8:

1.  Isaiah is speaking to Ahaz, king of Judah and tells him that the sign of the virgin birth will be for him, Ahaz. This fact alone makes the application of Is. 7:14 to the birth of Messiah impossible since Ahaz had been dead some 700 years before Yahshua was born. Yahshua's birth would not have made a very good sign for a dead guy.

2. The entire context refers to the specific issue of the prophecy regarding what would happen to those who were plotting against Judah, of whom Ahaz was king.

3.  Only a few verses later, in 8:3, we see the birth that was prophesied, that being the birth of Isaiah's son with his second wife. So, if 7:14 were at the least a near/far prophecy then Mary would not have been the only virgin to give birth. If we apply virgin in the "betula" sense to Mary, we must do the same for Isaiah's wife (was his child Yahweh in the flesh, too?).

4.  Isaiah 7:16 and 8:4 are almost identical, proving them to reference the same event, that Yahweh would eliminate the threat posed to Ahaz by Ephraim and Damascus.


5.  It seems the only way Isaiah 7:14 can be used as a Messianic prophecy is to completely rip it from it's context.


6.  Yahweh calls either Isaiah or Ahaz "Immanuel" in 8:8.


Incidentally, the idea of a virgin birth is not strictly a Christian concept. Consider these virgin births from history: Buddha, born of virgin Maya; Horus, born of virgin Isis; Attis, born of virgin Nama; Adonis, born of virgin Myrrha; Krishna, born of virgin Devak; Quirrnus, Indra, Mithra, Zoroaster, all the pharaohs, all Greek emperors, even Alexander the Great were all supposedly born of virgins, probably more. Another popular theme in pagan religions is elohim procreating with mankind. In Gen 6 the sons of elohim lusting after the daughters of men was not a good thing. It was part of the reason Yahweh destroyed the world by flood. Now it seems Christianity claims that Yahweh did a similar thing with Mary.

(On a side note, we're finding there's a pretty even split among those Messianics who don't believe Yahshua is Yahweh in the flesh; some do still claim the validity of the virgin birth. Admittedly, it's hard for some to believe that scripture could have been so twisted.)

With this in mind, is it any wonder that this most important doctrine is included with the rest of the Greek paganism that entered the church? We're finding that many scriptures that would be better translated one way are instead translated with a Trinitarian slant. Yet aside from a handful of these sorts of scriptures (like Micah 5:2) and this apparently false prophecy in Matthew and Luke, the idea of Yahweh himself coming in the flesh is strangely absent from the whole of scripture. Really! Think on it.


You know that sometimes what is not said is as important as what is said. Fishy virgin birth aside, we only have come across one other mention in scripture of an elohim coming in the flesh and it ain't purdy, ma friend.
Act 14:11 And when the multitudes saw what Paul had done, they raised their voice, saying in the Lycaonian language, "The elohim have become like men and have come down to us."

Act 14:12 And they began calling Barnabas, Zeus, and Paul, Hermes, because he was the chief speaker.

Act 14:13 And the priest of Zeus, whose temple was just outside the city, brought oxen and garlands to the gates, and wanted to offer sacrifice with the crowds.

Act 14:14 But when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of it, they tore their robes and rushed out into the crowd, crying out

Act 14:15 and saying, "Men, why are you doing these things? We are also men of the same nature as you, and preach the gospel to you in order that you should turn from these vain things to a living elohim, WHO MADE THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH AND THE SEA, AND ALL THAT IS IN THEM.

Now, maybe they were just upset that they were the ones being worshipped, but wouldn't this have been a good time for them to explain that Yahshua was the elohim in the flesh to whom they owed homage, if such a thing were true?
I know it's hard to comprehend this Yahshua-as-just-a-man thing at first because it seems that we must accept the Yahweh-in-flesh doctrine to accept Yahshua as Messiah, but after a bit of studying and reexamining of what we "thought" we knew, everything (so far) has fallen into place and it really makes clear a lot of things that had been unclear to us in the past, things a lot of people struggle with in trying to make sense of the Trinity. It's also a touchy topic because Yahweh and Yahshua's very characters are being questioned either way and that's a hard place to be for anyone who loves them.

And he shall be called....

When Isaiah 9:6 says that Yahshua's name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty Elohim, Eternal Father, etc., we don't feel it's saying that Yahshua is the eternal Father, but that he has the characteristics of Yahweh. The word "name" in scripture seems to imply the character rather than merely a form of address. In Lazarus 17:11-12 Yahshua, when praying to the father (explain that?), twice refers to "your name, the name which you have given me."

Incidentally, this passage includes the oneness theme that we find elsewhere in scripture, but does oneness mean that Yahshua IS Yahweh? He prays that we (his sheep) would be one the same way he and the Father are one. This gives us an idea of what kind of oneness we're talking about - if we can be one the same way Yahshua and the Father are one, then I don't think it means they're the same person, rather that they have the same character.

The Image of Elohim, Creator Yahshua?

(From Bobby's notes)


Eikon (image)1504
Col 1:15 And He is the image of the invisible Elohim, the first-born of all creation.


Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created by Him and for Him.


Col 1:17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.

a likeness, a statue, profile, representation, resemblance, pattern, portrait, image as in reflection, or image as in the mind, similitude. note: none of these are equal to the genuine article.

prototokos (firstborn)4416
first born, birthright, inheritance rights of the firstborn, first begotten, rights of the firstborn.

If Paul was trying to say that Yahshua is YHWH, why did he not just say so? Did he not shoot himself in the foot if he meant to have people believe that Yahshua is YHWH by using the word

Eikon in this verse? Are we not the image of YHWH?
1Co 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image (eikon) and glory of YHWH: but the woman is the glory of the man.
Does that mean that I'm YHWH? Same word used! Of course it doesn't mean I'm YHWH. The same understanding we come to in 1 Cor. is what he intends us to come to in Col 1:15

First born
Exo 4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith YHWH, Israel is my son, even my firstborn:
Psa 89:27 Also I will make him my firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth.

Jer 31:9 They shall come with weeping, and with supplications will I lead them: I will cause them to walk by the rivers of waters in a straight way, wherein they shall not stumble: for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.

Rom 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Rev 1:5 And from the messiah Yahshua, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood.
If we look at the context, don't we see many first born spoken of in the bible? Now, is Paul speaking of a preexistence or is he referring to the fact that Yahshua, having been raised from the dead by YHWH (Yahshua's Elohim), is the firstborn of the dead? Yahshua was the first to be raised from the dead into eternal life, therefore giving all that follow his footsteps of faith and obedience hope that they will follow him into a resurrection of eternal life.

Col.1:16

here we have to look at a few words again

En 1722
in, at, on, by, about, after, against, almost, altogether, among, as, before, between, by all means, for the sake of, because of, through, when, where

Dia 1223
dee-ah'
through, with, for, the ground or reason that something is or is not done, by reason of, on account of, for the sake of, for this cause, because, because of, etc note: this often refers to the reason for something

So, in essence we have:
Col 1:16 For the sake of him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created on account of him, and for him:
We see a similar Trinitarian "translator's choice" in Hebrews.

Heb 1:2 in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through (dia - "for, because of,") whom also He made the world.

Heb 1:3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Heb 1:4 having become as much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they.

Heb 1:5 For to which of the angels did He ever say, "THOU ART MY SON, TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN THEE"? And again, "I WILL BE A FATHER TO HIM AND HE SHALL BE A SON TO ME"?

The whole of this passage (and much besides) of Hebrews supports a man-Yahshua. "Exact representation of his (YHWH's) nature," words such as "inherited, son, begotten, father," Yahshua sitting at Yahweh's right hand. And subtle but important phrases such as, "having become as much better than the angels." Wasn't Yahweh already better than the angels? (Similar to the idea of Yahshua learning obedience and being made perfect, Heb 5:8-9) Scripture is FULL of these things!

Equality with Elohim...

(again from B's notes)

Php 2:5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Messiah Yahshua,

Php 2:6 who, although He existed in the form of elohim, did not regard equality with Elohim a thing to be grasped,

Php 2:7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men.

Php 2:8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

Form? Isn't that the same theme as an image? Let's see shall we?

Morphe H3444
Shape, nature, form, character, outward appearance

Couldn't Paul just as easily be saying here that even though Yahshua appeared as elohim (which is used for kings, judges and yup, you guessed it, even satan) he did not take advantage of the situation (being a king from the line of David he could have claimed a throne) instead he humbled himself and became like an obedient servant (like an average every day Joe Shmoe) instead of Elohim (king), so obedient that he died in his obedience to YHWH's command? Couldn't he have profited by claiming his kingship here on earth? Isn't that humbling yourself, having that much influence yet not using it to your advantage? Don't verses 9-10 show that Paul did not think that Yahshua was YHWH by differentiating the two?


And the Word was Elohim...
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim.


Joh 1:2 The same was in the beginning with Elohim.


Joh 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

(B's notes again)

key elements to see here is that what is translated as "word" is - logos 3056

1) something said 2) a topic 3) a reasoning 4) motive 5) computation 6) devine expression 7) treatise 8) utterance 9) word 10)work

Let's read that again shall we?
In the beginning was the plan (motive), and the plan (motive) was with Elohim, and the plan (motive) was Elohim.
We can only know Yahweh or his plan by reading his Torah (divine expression). Therefore his plan (motive) is the very manifestation of himself. Yahshua, as the perfect servant, revealed the character more than any other man, however, everything he did and preached was accomplished within the sphere of YHWH's divine plan (logos) (just as we are to do!). The rendering of logos to "word" in John 1:1 is not as logical unless one is already predisposed to believe in the Trinitarian view, and intentionally biases the translation to support a mysterious inner meaning. Greek writer Heraclitus first used the term logos around 600 bc to designate "the divine reason or plan which coordinates a changing universe" So here we have a historic proper understanding of the term logos as divine thought, plan, or motive. This rendering is logical (it makes sense) and removes the cloud (albeit man-made) of mysticism from YHWH.

Also are we to believe in the preexistence of Yahshua?
Rom 4:17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even YHWH, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.
1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 1:20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, 1:21 Who by him do believe in YHWH, that raised Yahshua up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in YHWH.
Rev 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

So, from revelation 13:8 are we to believe that Yahshua was slain before the foundation of the world physically? I don't get that from these. I see that YHWH had a plan (motive) and that plan (motive) was with YHWH in the beginning, before the foundation of the world.


* * * * *

That about covers the scriptures you presented in your letter (and then some, eh?) and we're sure (we hope!) that you'll have more questions.

Bobby has another question for ya: Can Yahweh be tempted to worship Satan?

We've considered many aspects of these doctrines. Besides the ones we've touched on in this letter we've also looked into the significance of "I AM," worship of Yahshua, the immortality of Yahweh, the temptation of Yahshua, as well as why the modern church believes what it does and why they won't let go of their traditions (not unlike the Torah issue). We're very excited by what we're learning. It's so neat to watch the pieces of the puzzle snap into place!

I think one of the scariest things about studying this belief for me (K) is not wanting to let go of who I always thought Yahshua was. I had to pray fervently that Yahweh would forgive me my mistakes and any lies I'd inherited, while helping me to know and understand him better. It’s sobering indeed to realize that you might have been worshiping a man as deity or that you might swing too far and not give Yahshua his due credit and respect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
     I hope and pray this has benefited my blog readers in some way!